A letter written by S.N. Colman-Holland, of 43 St. John’s Road, Warminster, for publication in local newspapers, expressing concern about the proposed route of the Warminster Inner Relief Road, asking councillors to reject it in favour of a plan more acceptable to the citizens of the town. The letter is dated 4th April 1969:
Dear Sir,
I had applied to speak at the second public meeting on the proposed new inner relief road held in Kingdown School but my form appeared to have been mislaid. I had the following points to raise:-
That having attended a six week course at our local education centre covering the “History of Warminster’ I, like most citizens, am aware that the proposed road will plough through the one part of this town where the largest part of its history lies. In these days far too much history is being disposed of.
There is much valuable property along the proposed route which, during the period between publication of the proposal, its execution or final rejection, becomes “frozen.’ Owners of such property do not know what they are likely to be offered in compensation for their losses. One thing is certain. It is the subject of very expensive negotiation which reduces dramatically the present day value of any affected land or property. Those with buildings to be demolished know only too well that such buildings cannot be replaced at present day prices. All land and property including that bordering the area suffers the Planning Blight which sterilizes any development for a considerable time – thus creating hardship to the individual.
I trust Mr. Harraway will not object to my mentioning here that his nurseries is a fair example of individual hardship. That area would be split into three uneconomic units making it impossible to trade as a nursery and garden centre – this being a pity since we are favored with such a centre close to town as opposed to several miles away as in most towns and cities. This, the park, the football ground, cricket ground, schools’ grounds, etc., are all places that will be affected if our Councillor friends support the proposal – not to mention splitting the town in half.
We boast a Fire Brigade of nineteen most efficient men and ten of them live in the West End of our town. At the moment they are collected and sent to a fire in four minutes flat. I estimate it would take nine to ten minutes to perform today’s routine if the new road is approved and I shudder to think of the possible loss of life and property should there be fires in the roads that will become cul-de-sacs; unless the “second Warminster’ is to have its own Fire Brigade.
I could not agree with the speaker who referred to “a few people always get hurt in cases like this’ because it is not a “few’ it’s an awful lot of people, an awful lot of property, and a lot of historical and beautiful buildings and areas that will be affected. Mr. Chadwick referred to other ideas that had been looked into and rejected – but the people of Warminster have not seen such plans and rejected them!
In conclusion. The members of our council know how the majority of the citizens of Warminster feel and I feel confident they will not vote for it. By rejecting this they will certainly have the vote of every citizen at any future election.
Rumour has it that Mr. Chadwick will retire soon. I don’t think he is old enough and I trust he will be around long enough to help Warminster with a plan acceptable to the majority making sure that it is only a few or none at all that get hurt.
Yours sincerely,
S.N Colman-Holland.