South And West Wilts Hunt
Provisional Appointments
23rd February 1985 ~ Tytherington
25th February 1985 ~ Hook Manor, Donhead
28th February 1985 ~ Rodmead
2nd March 1985 ~ Fonthill Bishop
4th March 1985 ~ Heytesbury Checkpoint
6th March 1985 ~ Bake Barn
All meets at 10.45 a.m.
Category: Lob In The Landscape
Information and pictures of mostly rural topics and activities.
The Excavation Of Eighteen Round Barrows Near Shrewton
The Proceedings Of The Prehistoric Society, Volume 50, Issue 1, December 1984, includes on pages 255 to 318, a research article: The Excavation of Eighteen Round Barrows near Shrewton, Wiltshire by Charles Green, Stephen Rollo-Smith, Elisabeth Crowfoot and Calvin Wells.
The excavation of eighteen round barrows was undertaken by the late Charles Green during summer seasons from 1958 to 1960, in advance of their destruction by ploughing. The excavated barrows are members of two linear groups which occupy adjacent spurs to the east of the village of Shrewton in the modern parish of that name (fig. 1). One of the barrows investigated lies in Winterbourne Stoke parish. This western part of Salisbury Plain is termed the “Lower Plain’ comprising those areas having their “upper limit… between 400 and 450 feet OD and their lower limit where they overlook the valley trenches … between 250 and 300 feet O.D.’ (Gifford 1957, 6). In such a lower valley lie the modern villages of Shrewton and Rollestone, and through it flows the river Till, the nearest modern open water supply to the barrows. This connects the area to the River Avon via the Wylye and Nadder.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-prehistoric-society/article/abs/excavation-of-eighteen-round-barrows-near-shrewton-wiltshire/FA170C9C23A95073BA04F170129807EA
King Barrow, Warminster
Bruce Watkin, in his Bishopstrow Village Trail leaflet, produced in 1984, later incorporated into the book Trails In And Around Warminster published in 1985, noted:
To the north [of Bishopstrow House Hotel] is the prominent Neolithic King Barrow (just in Warminster parish).
Bishopstrow Castle Motte
Bruce Watkin, in his Bishopstrow Village Trail leaflet, produced in 1984, later incorporated into the book Trails In And Around Warminster published in 1985, noted:
To the east of the present house [Bishopstrow House Hotel] is the motte of a small mediaeval castle.
Knook Castle
From Hillforts Of The Wylye And Avon Valleys, by the Hillfort Study Group, Salisbury, April 1984:
ST 960440
This is a somewhat enigmatic site, due partly to its nature and relationship to other nearby sites and partly to the total lack of information on its date. It therefore constitutes an ideal site on which the Hillfort Study Group can exercise its combined talents.
It consists of a sub-rectangular area enclosed by a single bank and ditch, the area enclosed being some 1.5 hectares. A simple entrance on the southern side may be original, while the break on the west is doubtless modern.
It lies on the lower slopes of a hill which is crowned by the long barrow known as Knook Barrow, and in an area strewn with round barrows, linear earthworks, excavated Romano-British settlement sites and associated field systems.
While some commentators have seen it as a defended cattle pen associated with the Knook West settlement site, others have regarded it as a “camp’ in its own right. Its position on the lower slopes of the hill point to an intention somewhat different from other “defensive’ sites in the area, and indeed its close proximity to the Romano-British settlements and field system does look intentional, though the connection could be entirely spurious as we have no evidence of contemporaneity.
Cley Hill Camp, Corsley
From Hillforts Of The Wylye And Avon Valleys, by the Hillfort Study Group, Salisbury, April 1984:
Cley Hill Camp, Corsley
ST 839449
The site is situated on an isolated chalk knoll, steep-sided, on the north side of the Wylye valley. The defenses consist of a berm and considerable scarp on the north and west, with segments of counterscarp bank at the north-west corner. The area enclosed is some 7 hectares, though the exact nature of the south-west corner cannot be ascertained because of the very considerable disused chalk quarry which now occupies that area. In the absence of a good candidate elsewhere, it has been suggested that the original entrance to the fort was in this south-west corner. The rather more flimsy and indeed interrupted nature of the eastern side of the defenses led the Ordnance Survey field investigator to suggest that the hill fort may have been unfinished.
On this same eastern side are two terraces which begin on steep natural slopes near the bottom of the hill at the north end and which run on to meet the quarry at the southern end. While the opinion of Palmer is that these are unlikely to have been part of the hill fort defenses – he suggests the medieval strip lynchets – more recent air photographs seem to show this as an area of enclosure attached to the hill fort; the same photographs, taken in 1975-7 show extensive evidence of house platforms and pits, suggesting that the hill fort was not in fact unfinished.
Scratchbury Camp Hill Fort
From Hillforts Of The Wylye And Avon Valleys, by the Hillfort Study Group, Salisbury, April 1984:
ST 911442
This fine univallate hill fort is situated on the north side of the Wylye valley overlooking the river just downstream from Battlesbury.
The site is multi-period, though details of the different phases are not yet clear. The earliest known features on the site are five round barrows, three at least of which have been excavated. Recognised since 1812 (Colt Hoare) has been the enclosure in the centre of the subsequent hillfort, which looks D-shaped on account of its butting up against a bank which subdivides the fort. O.G.S. Crawford thought that this earlier enclosure might be a Neolithic causewayed camp, but excavations in 1957 showed it to be earlier Iron Age.
Air photographs seem to show a crop mark continuing the circle to the south-east of the linear bank, so that it seems likely to have been originally near circular. The linear bank which seems to have cut across this enclosure runs south-west to north-east and appears to be overlain by the main hillfort earthwork at the north-east entrance, as well as disappearing under the rampart at the south-west corner. It has been suggested that this may have been the original line decided for the hillfort rampart, and that there was subsequently a change of plan; this could only be shown if excavation were to prove the chronology to be suitable. Whatever the answer, the main hillfort rampart postdates the linear bank, and consists of a single bank and ditch with counterscarp enclosing over 15 hectares.
There are three entrances, in the north-west, north-east and south-east, none of them apparently of great complexity, though the overlapping, passage-style of that in the north-east contrasts with the more direct entry afforded by the other two entrances.
Signs of the quarry ditch are visible in the south-east, while small depressions at the north-west may represent hut sites or pits. Following all this activity a bank cuts off a small section of the southern part of the fort, and presumably dates to the Romano-British period or later.
Stray finds from the fort recorded by Colt Hoare include a jade axe, a ground flint axe and “British and Roman pottery’. A Roman bronze spoon was found in 1804. Trial excavations in 1957 yielded Iron Age pottery from the primary filling of the ditch of the inner enclosure. One of the barrows near the north-east gate produced a cremation, and Cunnington’s 1802 excavation of one of those in the south-west yielded only animal bones and burnt stones. His same-day excavation of the central tumulus was more profitable: the haul was a bronze dagger, bronze pin, a large amber ring and fifty amber beads.
New Shop And Restaurant At East Street, Warminster
January 1981
Advertisement:
The Isis Gallery of fine art and quality crafts.
Welcome to our new shop at 40 East Street, Warminster. Telephone 216815.
Original paintings, prints and drawings.
Hand-made soft toys and handicrafts.
Expert picture framing.
Athena posters, cards and prints.
And much, much more.
Plus, try our new restaurant for the best in American home cooking.
Pizzas, Pancakes, Mexican Food, Hamburgers, Thick Shakes, Sandwiches and more. Dishes too numerous to mention.
Damask Way, Warminster ~ Named After Damask Farm
The Reverend John Day, in his booklet Christ Church, The First 150 Years, written in 1980, confirmed that Damask Way took its name from Damask Farm, the houses having been built on the farm’s fields. The Reverend Day mentioned that “The old farm house still stands in Upper Marsh Road.”
A Keeper’s Year On The Longleat Estate
Written by Percy Trollope in 1978:
On the edge of the village of Horningsham was a thatched cottage, one of the only two left of the hamlet of Little Horningsham, which at one time could boast a Manor House, a Chapel, a Farmstead, a Poor House, and a number of cottages. This cottage was in the 19th century occupied by one of the Longleat Estate game keepers. His job was to see that in an area allotted to him, consisting of several woods and of farmland – called his ‘Beat,’ game birds, and at one time, ground game, were preserved. The farm tenancies agreements included clauses that game was to be preserved for the landlord’s sport.
It was about 1908 that I became interested in the life of this keeper living in the thatched cottage with his wife and two sons aged seven and six. These two boys were my playmates during weekends and evenings in spring and summer. I spent much time with them, helping them with chores allotted them by their father who was extremely strict and stern with them and they feared him. He would chastise them with a dog whip if they offended, and demanded that they thanked him for the whipping. To their father they had always to be obedient. Their mother was just the opposite, being most kind and she did her best to protect the boys. It is against such a background that I write of a keeper’s year.
When the shooting season ended on February 1st, the keeper started to prepare for the next shooting which would begin on September 1st for partridges or on October 1st for pheasants. The first job was to overhaul all the hatching equipment used for the previous season – the hen coops, sitting boxes, shelters, etc. The hatching eggs for the new season came from the pheasant hen birds who had escaped being shot the previous seasons. Each year the eleven keepers on the Longleat Estate, including Mussell, Lewer, Barter, the Garretts, Parker, Scott, and the headkeeper Stockley, would raise several hundred young birds on each of the eleven beats.
The breeding season began in April. Each keeper had to find the necessary number of eggs from the nests of the surviving wild birds; they laid their eggs in nests made on the ground in rough vegetation, or in the woods, or on the banks of hedgerows. On the ground the hen merely made a ‘scrape,’ which was sometimes difficult to locate. The keeper needed the help of his sons and many local friends to hunt the gorse-covered ground, the woods and the hedgerows, to find the nesting sites. When found, the keeper would visit them every few days replacing eggs taken with dummy eggs to encourage the hen to lay her full clutch in that particular nest – often as many as 14. The eggs would be carefully handled and placed in special boxes made for the purpose. They then had to be hatched by ordinary hens. Each keeper kept a flock of poultry and used his broodies; sometimes it was necessary to hire them from cottagers and farmers at one shilling a broody, which would be returned in good condition. They were sometimes bought outright for two shillings or two shillings and sixpence.
The Little Horningsham keeper had a hatching shed attached to his cottage, where the sitting boxes were housed. As far as possible eggs of the same age would be set at the same time, so that a large number of chicks could be taken to the Rearing Field at once.
I remember seeing the sitting hens being taken off their nests each morning to be fed and watered. Each hen would be tethered to a stout hazel rod by means of a string slip. They were fed on maize, the most suitable food, providing heat for the hen’s body and being slow to digest. After the feeding it was necessary to observe that each hen had “manured” so that the nest would not be fouled. The manure was collected by the boys, to be used on the garden.
In the early spring the Head Keeper who lived at Aucombe, near Heaven’s Gate, would negotiate with farmers who had suitable Rearing Fields; there was no difficulty as compensation would be paid by the Estate agent. The Rearing Fields having been decided, the hen coops would be taken there and deposited at about 10 to 12 yards apart. The keeper had the responsibility to find and hire a lad who had left school, to be his ‘Bird Boy.’ He would start his employment in the early spring and assist in finding the pheasant eggs and make himself generally useful to the keeper. His wage would be six shillings per week. It was necessary to provide in each Rearing Field a hut for the bird-minder. This was a rough construction of six feet by six feet by six feet, with sacks nailed to the sides and sheets of galvanised iron for the roof.
The incubation of the pheasant eggs was arranged so that there were a large number hatched about the same time. After about 24 hours in the nest each brood would be taken to the Rearing Field and placed in a coop, a water bowl was provided for the mother hen and chicks, and a large bough of a bush would be placed near the coop as a protection against predators.
The food for the chicks was prepared at the Keeper’s cottage and would consist of sifted barley meal, biscuit meal, chopped boiled rabbit, chopped boiled eggs, and a little spice (a vitamin additive that encouraged growth and which was normally bought from Gilbertsons). Feeding was usually done by the keeper three times a day. The Bird Boy’s job was to see that nothing interfered with the chicks’ welfare. It was essential that feeding times were regular. If the Bird Boy had no watch, the keeper would erect a sundial in the Rearing Field, and, if necessary, correct it every morning if the sun was shining. At the Keeper’s house there was a building called the “Maggot House,” where flies could deposit their eggs in the suspended carcase of a cow or a horse, to produce fat maggots; the carcase was shaken and the maggots collected in a tray, shovelled into a pan of boiling water and so sterilized. They were distributed to the keepers to be included in the young pheasant chick’s feed.
The time came when the young birds were inclined to roost outside their coops. Every evening they had to be coaxed into their coops, to be penned up for the night, allowing the Bird Boy to go home. When this became too difficult it was time to remove the coops and the birds to the edge of the wood where they could roost on the lower branches of trees or on bushes. A lantern burning away all through the night was hung nearby to scare away foxes. The young birds would explore their new surroundings and had an inclination to wander away from the wood; it was necessary for someone to drive them back and prevent them from straying into a rival keeper’s beat or on to a neighbouring estate. To encourage them to stay in their wood, an ample supply of grain would be spread in the rides.
The keeper now had more time for his continuous war on vermin. To the keeper all foxes, stoats, weasels, hedgehogs, and rats, were vermin. Bird predators were crows, magpies, jays and members of the hawk family. Trapping of ground vermin went on throughout the year, mostly with tunnel traps. A small tunnel was built over a likely run, e.g. from hedgerow to a wood. There would be a number of tunnels with traps, set in suitable places on the keeper’s beat, and he would inspect them whenever he passed that way. The farm workers on his beat, of course, knew where these traps were and sometimes a rabbit in a trap would make a nice meal. The keeper knew this happened and tolerated it, provided the trap was reset.
In April and the beginning of May, the Longleat keepers would organise “Magpie” shoots. The Head Keeper would ask local farmers to take part. Really the shoot was a cover-up to shoot foxes who were the most dangerous predators of game birds. They often raided sitting hen pheasant nests, consuming the eggs and taking the pheasant as a meal for their cubs. The foxes that were shot were never added to the Keeper’s ‘Gallows.’ This was usually a low branch of a tree to which were tied the vermin victims by the head until they rotted away. The string loops were left hanging as evidence of the keeper’s activity. Some keepers would shoot owls in their over-enthusiasm to protect game birds – they failed to recognise that owls preyed on vermin. The Gallows were sited where the Head Keeper, on shooting days, would pass by.
The skins of the foxes were often sold to add to the keeper’s wages. He had to be careful not to reveal the number of foxes destroyed, especially if his master was a hunting man. He was expected to have a show of foxes available when the local Hunt came that way and he would be reprimanded if there were several blank days. But, of course, the preservation of game and the preservation of foxes at the same time was practically impossible.
One of the ways guests and friends of the Marquis of Bath were entertained when visiting Longleat, was to be invited to take part in a game shoot. Much thought and preparation were needed to arrange a day’s shoot. Each keeper was responsible to provide enough birds on his own ‘Beat.’
They were stationed at Aucombe, Park Hill, Crabtree, Norridge, Black Dog, Gunville, St. Algars, High Wood, Swancombe, Foxholes, Little Horningsham, and at Keisly [Keysley], Kingston Deverill. Pheasant shooting began on 1st October but on the Longleat Estate shoots were deferred until December. Around the Christmas season large shoots took place when more than 1,000 birds would be shot in a day.
The Head Keeper was responsible for placing the individual guns. Marking sticks with numbers would be placed at points outside the wood with a good view of the flying birds. They were allotted by the Head Keeper who would have had instructions from ‘The House’ to place the most important guests at the best points. The keeper of the ‘Beat,’ where the shoot took place was in control of the beaters and he would walk in the middle of the line of beaters as they went through the wood to make sure they were in a straight line so that the guns would know where they were. Most of the beaters came from the Woods department of the Estate. The Head Forester, having been given information, would select the men and tell them where and when to meet. The shoot usually started at 10.00 a.m. The other keepers would bring their black or golden retrievers to retrieve the shot birds which would be taken to the ‘Game Cart’ which was specially made to carry game.
The Game Cart was a four-wheeled vehicle, green in colour, with a tilted roof. Dead game would be hung on hooks on both sides and there were more on the roof rafters. It was horse-drawn, and made by a local carriage-maker. It was usually in the charge of an Estate farm employee who would be responsible to keep it clean inside and out. The man I knew who ‘went with the Game Cart,’ when I was a boy, was Jacob Garrett, brother to the Garretts already mentioned.
The morning shoot would be followed by lunch. A site would have been chosen where the morning shoot usually ended. The gun guests were provided with a sit-down lunch at tables and ‘trestles.’ Hot food and soup was brought at the correct time, and footmen from Longleat House waited on the guests and made sure everything was correctly done. Some of the guests provided their own loaders; for others a keeper would load. If there was a surplus of soup it was given to the loaders, who would be grouped a little distance away from the beaters who were having their bread and cheese, washed down with ale drawn from a small barrel.
Luncheon over, the beaters would walk and line up for the next drive, giving the guns time to get to their marked shooting points. The afternoon shoot usually finished about 4.00 p.m., when everybody assembled. The gun guests would have their horse or motor conveyances waiting for them to take them back to their place of residence. The beaters would disperse to their cottages which could be a walk of several miles. The keepers would probably ride back in the Game Cart.
On some beats a large number of rabbits would be shot, especially near the chalk downs. If it had been a successful day, the beaters would be given a couple of rabbits each and on some occasions a quart of beer which would be obtained from a public house on their way home; the landlord would send the bill to the Estate Office.
Towards the end of the shooting season only the cock pheasants would be shot and as the birds rose the beaters shouted either “A cock over” or “A hen over”; the guns would only shoot the cock birds. The day after a shoot the keepers would go over the ground to pick up any wounded birds or dead birds not retrieved.
On the Longleat Estate it was customary at the close of the shooting season for the keepers and beaters to be invited to a supper, usually held at the Bath Arms, Horningsham. There would be some guests including the ‘Mastermen’ on the estate, and the host of the Bath Arms would provide a hot meal laid out in the “Long Room.” Usually the Marquis of Bath would preside and after the ‘cloth’ was removed, His Lordship would say “Gentlemen, you may smoke,” and clay pipes called “Church Wardens” and tobacco would be distributed. Speeches would be made, commenting on the past shooting season; toasts would be proposed, to His Lordship and his family, carried with great acclamation. There would be the rendering of songs by certain members of the Head Keeper’s staff, and some of the beaters would be called upon to sing their well-known favourite songs such as “Jack Tar.” This would be the climax of the shooting season.
A word on wages. The Head Keeper at that time received about £2. 10 shillings per week, and his house. No doubt he received tips from the gun guests which might have amounted to several pounds in a season. Each of the other keepers received 16 shillings per week and their cottages, wood fuel would be available to them, rabbits at all times could be had, as well as an injured game bird. Some keepers no doubt received monies for fox pelts, rabbits and their skins, mole skins from the moles they trapped, and the advantage of having grain available for their hens.
The Bird Boys received six shillings per week and were employed for about three months, but if they proved their worth they might be taken on to the Estate staff.
The Head Forester received £2. 10 shillings per week, his foreman £1 per week. The woodmen’s wages were two shillings two pence per day, equalling thirteen shillings a week (hours 7.00 a.m. to 5.30 p.m., winter hours daylight to dusk). Those who did Sunday chores received 14 shillings a week.
The Farm Bailiff in 1914 received £2. 5 shillings per week. Farm men received 15 shillings per week.
The men who were called upon to do beating were supplied with an overcoat, light in colour, so that they could be clearly seen, and it was made of stout material suitable for rough walking through briars, etc., and sewn on were large buttons carrying the Thynne coat of arms. The beaters were also given thigh leggings against the wet undergrowth.
The keepers wore breeches and leggings, and a coat made of very stout material, light in colour, having two large inside pockets, in which they would put game birds or rabbits. There was also a waistcoat made of similar material.
They had no fixed hours of work, being more or less their own masters but were always under the supervision of the Head Keeper. They never seemed to have a holiday but they enjoyed their work; here was a certain professionalism about game keeping, and they were held in high esteem in their own community.
