Minutes Of The Annual Parish Meeting For Heytesbury, Imber And Knook, 2018

Friday 1st June 2018

Minutes Of The Annual Parish Meeting For Heytesbury Imber & Knook
Tuesday 29th May 2018. 7.15 p.m.
The Parish Council Chairman Councillor Mrs Ann Perry in the Chair.
Present: Councillors D Bond, S Buttenshaw, E Colvin, P Fellowes, L Gould, D Hiscock, A Moore, L Morris, A Perry and V Sturmey. Councillor C Newbury Wiltshire Council. Officers: H Parks, Danny Everett and Bill Parks Wiltshire Council. 
Public & Press: 24 members of the public and no press.

1. Welcome and Apologies
The Chairman welcomed all attendees. There was a late apology from Councillor Eastman.

2. Minutes
The minutes of the Parish Meeting held on 31st May 2017 were approved and signed by the Chairman.

3. Chairman’s Report
The Annual Report of the Parish Council 2017-2018 was received and circulated.

4. Flood Forum
Danny Everett (DE), Principle Technical Officer, Drainage, Wiltshire Council, attended the meeting to explain his role and also take questions. He outlined that he managed the capital expenditure on behalf of the County, which amounted to £1.2 million. He is the main contact with the EA and Defra and works with Towns and Parish Councils to reduce the risk of flooding where possible. Currently he leads on a project building a reservoir at Tilshead; a partnership with Wiltshire Council and Defra. To assist Parishes to develop their Flood Plans, he encourages them to inspect local ditches and watercourses which will identify priorities. During the heavy flooding of 2013/2014, 72% of the County reported flood issues. What my team are trying to do is find out those that are affected by flooding. Priorities are high speed roads and individual properties flooding. There are four people in the team who review all issues with drainage and manage all new planning applications. All flood plans are shared with the EA and they also have a duty to reduce the number of properties that flood. Discussions took place on a variety of issues:

• Gully emptying – report all gully issues on the Wiltshire Council app and they will be considered.

• Landowners are responsible for their stretch of riverbank, but what happens when the landowner is the MOD, what action can be taken? Residents were asked to mark the areas of concern on the Parish Map and he would discuss with his contacts at Landmarc and MOD.

• Councillor Colvin advised that she had experienced difficulties with her responsibilities and Lampreys. DE suggested that the publication “Living on the edge” would be beneficial to those who live near a watercourse.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/291417/response/708284/attach/html/2/Living%20on%20the%20Edge%20Booklet.pdf.html

• Cellar flooding is not considered to be classed as a flood property.

• Equipment provision – sandbags, gel sacs, high viz jackets and training were all available from the team.

• Residents felt that the Winterbourne bridge was not adequate for the high volumes of water – DE thought that this would not be classed as a priority. DE would review the build-up of silt under the bridge and would arrange a Parish visit.

• The National Flood Forum has a lot of advice and ideas in self-help for those affected.
https://nationalfloodforum.org.uk/ 01299 403 055

• Park Lane is a concern to residents who felt that it should be rectified. DE accepted that this needs to be reviewed and would consider during his visit with contact to the landowner if appropriate.

• Ownership of riverbeds was mentioned and it was agreed that it is sometimes difficult to establish ownership, and many landowners would not be in a rush to claim if there is a liability.

• A discussion on water quality and the use of eco products making a difference took place. It was accepted that incremental improvements make a big improvement.

• The planning application awaiting determination for 23 houses and village hall was discussed and the village being able to support additional pressure in terms of water runoff. DE was not working on this as a consultee but another member of the team would be dealing with. He would familiarise himself with the application. 

The Chairman thanked Danny for attending and providing such an informative session. He was given a round of applause. 

5. Outside Spaces Working Group (OSWG)
Councillor Sturmey reported to the meeting the activities of the group since it was formed.

6. Forum

• Anthony Wilson, Chair of Team Heytesbury circulated a paper to the meeting. He asked that the Parish Council consider the setting up of a sub committee to review the planning application of 23 houses and a village hall and publish a report of such a group, on line. No decision was made on this proposal.

• Councillor Liz Colvin suggested that a referendum is called. The Clerk advised on the process and that the cost would fall to the Parish Council. At this stage of the meeting a full discussion or proposal and vote had not taken place. She went on to ask whether the Parish should fund raise and buy the land. Councillor Chris Newbury advised the meeting that he had to be careful about his contribution as he sat on the Planning Committee, however he confirmed that this application had not yet been determined, revised plans are expected from the architect, but these have not yet been submitted. When he last spoke to officers, it appeared that it would be August before this application was likely to be determined. He appreciated that there were strong views on both sides, but all amendments would come to the Parish Council as a consultee for comment. The Land is outside the policy limits and there is no planning policy that supports exception sites unless the site was developed for social housing. The current use of the land, as recreation land is not safeguarded. There were differing views on the need or want of a village hall. Was there any other private land available for a village hall? The cost of renting the school hall was discussed, some believing it was too expensive. A proposal was put to the meeting that the Parish fundraise to try and purchase the land. The voting was 13 in favour and with those against 22, the proposal was not supported. There was no support for a referendum.

• Penny Copland-Griffiths spoke on the setting up of a befrienders group to assist those who have no family or friends to help in times of need. This was thought to be a marvellous idea. The Clerk thought that similar schemes may be already in place in some parts of Wiltshire and would seek information to pass on, one contact would be through the Health and Well-being Group run by Wiltshire Council Area Board. Contact would also be made through David Reeves.

• Councillor Liz Colvin and Louise Morris had investigated the provision of better broadband and made available literature from a company called True-speed who bring fibre optic to the house. If there is enough interest within a community, i.e. 30%, then the company would consider working in that area. Leaflets were made available for anyone who might be interested. Councillor Newbury spoke on the broadband project in Wiltshire. The Codford exchange was updated at the time, there was also a project officer in place. He would try and find out who might be involved at the present time.

The meeting closed at 8.55 p.m.

Wiltshire Council Have Granted (With Conditions) Planning Permission To Bishopstrow College For A Change Of Use Of Riverside House, Bishopstrow Road, Warminster, From A Family Home To A Boarding House

Wednesday 14th March 2018

A planning application [18/00639/FUL] by Bishopstrow College (at Barrow House, Bishopstrow Road, Warminster, BA12 9HU) submitted to Wiltshire Council for a change of use of Riverside House, 4 Bishopstrow Road, Warminster, BA12 9HQ, has been approved subject to conditions. The application was for a change of use, similar to that requested and approved for 3a Bishopstrow Road. “The property would be used for staff and student accommodation. The change of use would therefore be from being a family home to a boarding house, or C2 classification.”

Granting planning permission, Wiltshire Council have imposed the following conditions: 

In pursuance of its powers under the above Act, the Council hereby grant PLANNING PERMISSION for the above development to be carried out in accordance with the application and plans submitted (listed below). 

In accordance with paragraph 187 of the National Planning Policy Framework, Wiltshire Council has worked proactively to secure this development to improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area. 

Subject to the following conditions: 
1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

REASON: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

2 There shall be a maximum of eighteen occupants of whom fifteen shall be students residing within the accommodation hereby permitted.

REASON: In order to prevent the over intensive use of the property and in the interests of the amenity of the area.

3 There shall be a minimum of one resident member of staff present within the accommodation hereby permitted in the event that there are students residing within the property.

REASON: In the interests of student supervision and the amenity of the area.

4 The occupation of the accommodation hereby permitted shall remain ancillary to “Bishopstrow College”, Bishopstrow.

REASON: In order to define the terms of this permission and to accord with the submitted documentation justifying the proposal.

5 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

Drawing number P-01 Existing elevations and floor plans registered on 26.01.2018.

Drawing number P-02 Site Location Plan registered on 26.01.2018.

Drawing number P-03 Proposed elevations and floor plans registered on 26.01.2018.

REASON: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

Bishopstrow Parish Meeting Have Chosen To Object And Not Object To The Planning Application By Bishopstrow College For A Change Of Use At Riverside, Bishopstrow Road, Warminster

Wednesday 21st February 2018

Bishopstrow College (at Barrow House, Bishopstrow Road, Warminster, BA12 9HU) have applied to Wiltshire Council for planning permission [18/00639/FUL] for a change of use of Riverside House, 4 Bishopstrow Road, Warminster, BA12 9HQ. “The application is for a change of use, similar to that requested and approved for 3a Bishopstrow Road. The property would be used for staff and student accommodation. The change of use would therefore be from being a family home to a boarding house, or C2 classification.” Comments are invited (to Wiltshire Council) until Friday 23rd February 2018. The target date for a decision is Wednesday 14th March 2018.

Bishopstrow Parish Meeting, at a meeting held on Tuesday 20th February 2018, considered the above application and have responded to Wiltshire Council, ticking the boxes on the response form not only for “No objections” but also for “Object.”

Bishopstrow Parish Meeting’s reasons for ticking two boxes, objecting and not objecting, are given as follows:

“Suggested special conditions/reasons for decision based on local knowledge. Bishopstrow is very split over this planning application with a small majority in favour of raising an objection, hence the reason for ticking 2 boxes. However, the main reason given is the desire to see the house staying as a family home and hence more likely to have an impact on the life of our very small village. Additionally, the adjacent property (3a/Mandalay) has already been converted into a multi-occupancy dwelling as part of Bishopstrow College’s residential accommodation. The effect of 2 large adjacent houses becoming a residential accommodation annex for the College has therefore caused concern amongst many villagers, especially as there are plans in place to develop additional residential accommodation on the college site. However, if Wiltshire Council decides to allow planning permission, the village has concerns about road safety. As a village we have raised our problems of speeding traffic and inconsiderate driving through CATG and some proposals will be taken forward as projects. The location of the 2 houses will cause an additional hazard as students and staff will need to cross a busy road, on a bend that has no pavement on their side of the road. Traffic calming and safety measures should be conditions on this application and the cost of these for consultation, planning, installation and importantly maintenance cannot be borne by the village through its precept or other funds. The advice of WC’s highways team would be necessary to determine any requirements and planning consent should include such a consultation.”

Access On To Copheap Lane, Warminster ~ Where Cars Speed ~ But No Planning Reason To Object To Building Of Three Dwellings Behind No.32, Adjacent The Dolls House Shop

Monday 30th September 2013

At a meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee of Warminster Town Council, held at the Civic Centre, Warminster, on Monday 30th September 2013, Councillors Jamie Cullen, Andrew Davis, Nick Dombkowski, Sue Fraser, and Rob Fryer, voted unanimously in favour of a planning application to demolish an existing garage and shed to facilitate access and the erection of one terrace of three dwellings, on land at the rear of 32 Copheap Lane, Warminster, BA12 0BG. 

Councillors recognised that the application referred to land behind 32 Copheap Lane (a bungalow) and the neighbouring Dolls House shop. Recent concerns about speeding traffic on Copheap Lane were quickly expressed. Councillor Fraser said “There was an accident on the road there recently. Issues are being raised about speeding at Copheap Lane.” 

Town Clerk Heather Abernethie said “There is a need for a zebra crossing at Copheap Lane but there is no suitable site to place one.” 

Councillor Davis referring to the plans for the application said “Demolition of the garage and shed gives new access to No.32, while what was the entrance to No.32 then becomes the access to the proposed dwellings. That’s what they’re doing.”

Councillor Davis went on to say “I don’t think I like it but I can’t think of a planning reason to refuse it.” 

Councillors agreed all new properties come with parking. Councillor Fraser said “It’s not the houses that are the problem, but the access in and out, on to Copheap Lane, is the thing.” Councillor Cullen said “Three houses means six cars.” Councillor Davis said “Yes, the properties have car parking. The only thing against this is highways. There’s a drive there at the moment but it’s probably only being used by one car, not six.” 

Concerns about the access to a highway where cars speed along continued to be debated for some minutes. Councillor Fryer stated “I was overtaken by a car at the roundabout at Copheap Lane. The car went the wrong side of the roundabout to overtake me.” Councillor Fraser said “Cars do go so very fast there.” 

Councillor Fryer proposed in favour of the application. Councillor Fraser seconded. [13/03702/FUL]

32 Copheap Lane, Warminster.
Photographs by Danny Howell.

Planning permission is sought for
the demolition of the garage adjacent
32 Copheap Lane . . . 

. . . and the shed behind the garage.

The land behind 32 Copheap Lane, Warminster.
Planning permission is sought for a terrace
of three dwellings here.
Photograph by Danny Howell.

The land behind the Dolls House shop
at Copheap Lane, Warminster.

Photographs by Danny Howell.

Councillors are concerned about cars from
three new dwellings built behind No.32
having to come out on to Copheap Lane
at the location pictured above.

Councillors are aware that many motorists
drive their cars at considerable speeds
along Copheap Lane, and the access for
the proposed three dwellings is near a bend
on the brow of Copheap Lane,
not far from which was an accident recently.

The cars in this photograph, taken by Danny Howell,
were travelling under the 30 mph speed limit.