The Heytesbury Trail

The Heytesbury Trail
Written by Bruce Watkin, 1983:

A handsome village four miles east of Warminster, built along a gravel terrace above lush Wylye valley meadows and sheltered from the north by the chalk hills of Salisbury Plain, in “a part of the country singularly bright and beautiful” (Cobbett, 1826).

Heytesbury has an imposing church, a fine almshouse of mediaeval foundation, and a mansion which was once the home of the nationally-important Hungerford family. It was head of a mediaeval Hundred, and a Parliamentary borough with two Members for several hundred years. It was the centre of the Hungerfords’ sheep-rearing empire in the 14th and 15th centuries and of the Everetts’ chain of cloth factories in the late 18th.

Here was the junction of ancient routes, north-south across the Downs, and east-west along the Wylye. It was well turnpiked before Warminster, granted market and fairs as early as Warminster, and had more motive power in its river.

Apart from Warminster’s favour from late Saxon kings, more factors favoured Heytesbury; yet (relatively) its prosperity, population and prestige were in slow decline from the 14th century. In 1826 Cobbett said “This place, which is one of the rotten boroughs of Wiltshire and which was formerly a considerable town, is now but a very miserable affair.”

The parish, six square miles in extent, has its bulk on the high downland to the north, and its tail south to the hamlet of Tytherington on the far edge of the valley. The name derives from a forgotten Saxon woman. In 1086 the Manor was held by King William but a priest Alfward held the church and an estate with perhaps ten families. The Manor was granted by Henry II to Robert de Dunstanville of Castle Coombe but was soon divided into three estates, East, West and South Heytesbury, with their own Courts. West, otherwise known as “Borough”, appears to have been one of the early “new towns” created with Parliamentary privileges. The burgesses were concentrated here. The estates were reunited by the late 14th-century purchases of Sir Thomas Hungerford, whose family had married an Heytesbury heiress and held large estates in Berkshire, along the Wylye and in Somerset. The Hungerfords now made Heytesbury the centre of their estates. The value of the place was then relatively high, perhaps threequarters that of Warminster, but in fewer hands.

The Church however retained its separate estate. This was granted to Salisbury Cathedral in the early 12th century, generously endowed by Empress Maud and given collegiate status with four canons. In spite of the abolition of such titles in 1840 it is still known as the Collegiate Church. It was favoured too by the Hungerfords who rebuilt much and converted its north transept into a family chapel and chantry.

The Hungerfords also built and handsomely endowed the Hospital of St John and St Katherine as estate almshouses in 1442. But the family had setbacks, backing some wrong horses in the Wars of the Roses and then falling foul of Henry VIII. Sir Walter, Baron Hungerford of Heytesbury, firm supporter of the Tudors, was executed for high treason in 1540; family property was seized by the Crown and their chantries at Heytesbury and Salisbury suppressed. Some of the property, including Farleigh Hungerford Castle, was restored to them by Mary I, but they did not get back the Wylye Valley estates and the great house here, which Sir Walter was rebuilding “fit for a king,” was abandoned and slowly decayed.

The estate passed to the Moore family of Taunton, who sold it in 1641 to Edward Ashe of London and Halsted. The land was inherited by his granddaughter, who married Pierce a’Court of Ivychurch, near Salisbury, and the a’Courts held it down to the 1920s. The Ashe and a’Court families thus held most of Heytesbury for nearly 400 years and represented the Borough in Parliament for much of that time. The old house, said to have been patched up by the Ashes, was not completely rebuilt until the end of the 18th century. As a Borough, parliamentary elections were decided by burgesses, whose houses were concentrated in the area of Little London (hence perhaps its name) but these were usually owned by the Lords of the Manor or one other landowner (e.g. the a’Courts and the Duke of Marlborough in 1785). The Borough had, in fact, no contests from 1689 down to its abolition in 1832.

At the time of the Inclosure Award, in 1785, two-thirds of the parish was owned by the a’Courts and the only other substantial holding was that of the Dean of Salisbury, which had descended with the Church. There was a smaller estate held by Richard Crowch at Tytherington and about 100 acres held by the clothier John Gale Everett. There was cloth production here, as in many Wylye Valley villages, by the 15th century and there was a fulling mill in the 16th which supplied white broadcloth to the London cloth merchant Kitson. The trade survived modestly till the late 18th century, when the Everetts built or converted mills to drive new cloth machinery, at Greenlands to the west of the village and Mill Lane to the east, as they had done or were to do in a long chain of places from Horningsham through Crockerton and Bishopstrow to Upton Lovell. But both Heytesbury factories (which had employed 127 in 1847 when Warminster’s clothiers employed none) had closed in 1847 and Heytesbury’s “industrial revolution” was over. Perhaps better use was made of the available water in “drowning” the local water meadows than in exploiting the village’s child labour.

A bigger disaster had struck in 1765 causing considerable hardship when uncontrollable fire swept down the High Street and destroyed most of its houses and the Hungerford Hospital. Rebuilding after the fire accounts for the urbanity of the main street today. There were big changes in the early 19th century as the village moved westward. A new road and bridge across the Wylye were built east of the churchyard and in 1839 the turnpike road to Warminster, which had previously zigzagged up Chapel Street and along Little London, was straightened on its present course. New houses were built in the Little London and backlane areas, while older houses along Park Street (the Salisbury road) were abandoned. The railway came in 1856 and made communication with Salisbury and Bath easier, and Somerset coal cheaper. The station was some way south of the village and had surprisingly little effect on its development (it closed in 1955).

The population of the village (“urban” pretensions went out with the abolition of the Borough) had risen from 1072 in 1801, to a peak of 1412 in 1831 but from then on it declined steadily, in line with most Wiltshire villages, to 454 by 1931. The Heytesbury Estate was broken up in the 1920s – the House was later acquired by the poet Siegfried Sassoon – and much land north of the village was bought by the War Department for inclusion in their Imber Range. But, thanks in part to the establishment of the Army Camp at Knook, on the parish’s eastern border, the population increased after the Second World War, to 555 in the year 1951 and to 649 in 1981.

In spite of the roar of Trunk Road traffic through its principal street it is still an attractive place and the completion of its long-promised bypass should give new life to the ancient village.

The village is largely of two-storey stone buildings, with one long group close to the south side of the High Street. The Church and the prominent “prow” of of the former maltings on the same side make it the more impressive. On the north side are the “blind house,” the Hungerford Hospital at the east end, and then, set back in a well-wooded park, the present Heytesbury House.

The Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul. Stone and flint, cruciform, with squat central tower. “Noble,” says Betjeman, inside and out. There was a Saxon church here which was rebuilt grandly from the 12th century, as a Collegiate Church for four canons. The chancel, with its lancet arches and detached decorative columns of Purbeck marble, is part of the early rebuilding; the nave arcades and the top of the tower were not completed till the 14th century.

More rebuilding was done for the Hungerfords down to the early 16th century. They converted the north transept into a family chantry chapel, dedicated 1421, separated by a delicate perpendicular screen with fan covering. There was another chantry founded by Clyftons in 1305, in the south transept, but both were suppressed in the mid-16th century and only the Hungerford screen remains. Damage and neglect followed in the Civil War and the 18th century, and the Hungerford monuments were removed to Farleigh.

By the 18th century the chancel aisles were pulled down, the crossing walled off, galleries disfigured the nave, and pews were turned to face west. This was not remedied until the extensive restoration in 1865 – 1867 by William Butterfield, who removed the crossing wall and the nave galleries, rebuilt the chancel aisles, put in a new wagon roof to the nave and decorated the chancel with his characteristic red and black tiles. The Church was renovated in 1967, when the nave roof was painted blue, its carved bosses coloured and the walls lime-washed.

Of special interest are the Hungerford chapel screen, the remains of a Hungerford tomb-chest. monuments in the Chapel to the Ashes and a’Courts and in the north chancel chapel to Thomas Moore (died 1623), with the damaged figures of Moore, wife and daughter, which were reinstated here in 1959. Note also the memorial tablets in the south transept to the Everett, Flowers and Snelgrove families, to William Cunnington (the archaeologist, died 1810) and to vicar David Williams, a pioneer of Sunday Schools. The lancet arches with Purbeck columns and late 19th century glass by Alexander Gibbs in the chancel should be viewed.

The Hall and Church Cottage. A malthouse converted to village hall in 1936, now disused. Church Cottage is dated 1727. Other cottages on the north side of the churchyard were cleared in 1907.

Little London. This was the site of the burbage houses (No.32 was typical). It includes the Old Vicarage on the corner of Chapel Lane, and the Congregational Chapel, built in 1812.

The Blind House. A small octagonal stone “lock-up” with a stone tiled roof.

Ivy House is a late 18th century two-storey brick building with a mansard roof and partly stone wall to the west. Nos. 59 to 73 are mainly two-storey terraced stone cottages rebuilt after the 1765 fire.

Little House, is of 18th century brick, with a hipped roof.

The Angel Inn. Mainly two-storey colour-washed brick with stone string at first floor. Rebuilt in 18th century and later, though a rain-water head is dated 1692. Scene of Parliamentary “elections”.

The Hungerford Hospital. The Hospital of St John and St Katherine was built by the 2nd Lord Hungerford in 1442, for 12 poor men and two women, with a chapel and provision for a schoolmaster. It was refounded by his daughter-in-law in 1472 (see Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, volume 78).

It is a two-storey brick building with hipped tiled roof round three sides of a lawn. The central projecting pedimented bay has the Hungerford arms and a lantern. It is a rebuilding, after the 1765 fire, in a late 17th century style. It is still under the care of a “Custos” and has been extended at the rear in a neo-Georgian style.

Heytesbury House, a long low late-18th century rebuilding of the Hungerford’s mansion, done for the a’Courts in 1784. The eleven bay front is severely plain, only relieved by a semi-circular porch with Tuscan columns. Some of the rear was filled in, in 1820. Of the older mansion the only visible traces are a stone-mullioned window and old patterns of brick and stone, re-used in the hugely walled garden to the north-west. The a’Courts house has a fine dining room with a decorative chimney piece brought from Wardour. The manorial Court Leets were held here as late as 1931. It was sold by the a’Courts (now Lords Heytesbury) in 1926 and later bought by Siegfried Sassoon, the poet, who died here in 1967 (buried at Mells). The once splendid planting of the 95 acre park and the great stone wall to the Salisbury road are now decaying.

The Estate House, of 18th century stone, was the home of Sir Richard Colt Hoare’s archaeological colleague, William Cunnington, from 1775 to 1810. The “blue stone” found built into Bowls Barrow (on the way to Imber) was stored in the garden with many other finds before their removal to Salisbury and Devizes Museums.

In Mill Street is an early 18th century cottage labelled “R.Dann 1726”.

Parsonage Farmhouse was the home of Thomas Moore from 1615, when he acquired the Heytesbury Manor. It was bought by the Ashe family in 1726. Behind the pleasant 18th century road frontage is a dining room with a fine Jacobean ceiling and Moore’s arms over the fireplace. To the south is a Jacobean mullioned window.

Chancel End House is a two-storey 18th century brick house with stone quoins. The rear extension is 19th century.

Copyright Bruce Watkin.

Heytesbury

From The West Wiltshire District Guide 1978:

The village of Heytesbury is situated astride the A36 Bath-Southampton trunk road some three miles east of Warminster. Heytesbury has an agricultural history as well as an archaeological and parliamentary one, and much of it can be traced as far back as medieval times.

The village of Heytesbury is very ancient and is mentioned in the Domesday Book as Hestrebe.

The Collegiate Church of St. Peter and St. Paul, Heytesbury, was built in the 12th century, whilst the Angel Inn standing opposite the Hungerford Almshouse, probably goes back to 1400 A.D., and was an old coaching inn.

Heytesbury has few other buildings of historical or architectural interest, probably owing to the destruction of most of the town in its own Great Fire of 1765.

In the middle of Heytesbury High Street there stands one of the curious little “blind houses” an octagonal building with a stone tiled roof containing a dome, in which, many years ago, offenders were locked up by the village constable.

The Hospital of St. John is today the memorial of the famous Hungerford family, for apart from this almshouse, and the sickle badge on the screen of what remains of the old Hungerford Chantry of St. Michael in Heytesbury Church, there is nothing left to show that the Hungerfords ever lived here.

The Greenland Factory, Heytesbury

K.H. Rogers, in Wiltshire And Somerset Woollen Mills, published by the Pasold Research Fund Ltd., in 1976, noted:

In 1797, Sir William Pierce Ashe a’Court let to William Marven Everett of Heytesbury, clothier, a piece of waste ground called  Gooseacre at Greenland with a watercourse running through it, with liberty to use it for driving a mill, and the use of an adjoining ditch leading water to the watercourse as often as the meadows did not need watering. No fine was paid for the lease, but it included a covenant to make a mill pond and hatches. A covenant to build a clothing mill was, however, deleted before the lease was signed, but that this was intended is shown by a letter written the previous year by William Smith, the pioneer geologist:

On surveying the back Drain or Stream which runs thro’ the Lands of Sir William a’Court at the west end of the Town of Heytesbury, I find the Levels to be 4 feet 4 inches from the corner of Norton Meads to the Temporary Bay near Mr. Everett’s Cottages.

This Watercourse in its present state does not appear to be of any service whatever to any of the Mills in the neighbourhood nor to the adjoining Lands of Sir William a’Court except as a fence between the arable land and watermeads and as a back drain for the water in excessive Floods which I am informed happen but seldom and at a Season of the year when no damage can be done by overflowing the Meadows; but by building a capacious rolling Bay or Waste Weir the passage of the Floods will meet with no more obstruction than at present, therefore this objection as well as any possible injury to the water meadows may be entirely done away, the Ground on that side being from 2 to 3 feet above the highest surface of the water in the proposed millpond.

But I understand that the Fall of 4 feet 4 inches which is all that can be gained between the Ford into Norton Meads and the Temporary Bay will be scarcely adequate to the purpose of a Mill. I would therefore recommend as there is a considerable fall about 40 to 50 yards below to deepen that part of of the River which is very shallow by cleansing it of the gravel which now obstructs the passage of the water from above.

If this was done, which I think the gravel for the use of the roads would pay the expense of, near an acre of land which is now covered with sedges and little better than a Quicksand might be taken into the adjoining meadows from different parts of the River and converted into good ground, and several acres on the South side which now appear to lay in a wet state might be considerably improved by the extra drainage which this lowering of the water in the River will certainly effect, and in addition to these improvements, which I would recommend if no Mill is to be built, shall be enabled to add 1 foot 5 inches and 7 tenths which I apprehend is sufficient for the purpose of the intended Mill without any encroachment on the Parish of Norton or injury to the Watermeads but on the contrary would prove to be a considerable improvement to the latter.
Wm. Smith. Surveyor.
Cottage Crescent, near Bath.
Oct. 31st 1796.

In December 1796 Everett advertised for a ‘person who is a complete master of the management of scribbling and carding engines, and is also able to superintend the slobbing and spinning’.

The lease was renewed in 1803 including ‘buildings now erecting thereon’, and there was a covenant to erect a good and substantial dye-house and all necessary buildings for carrying on the business of washing and dyeing wool. In 1807 Everett enquired the cost of, and probably bought, a 12 h.p. steam-engine from Boulton and Watt. A further renewal in 1817 referred to dwelling house converted into a factory called White’s, and a survey of 1825 shows that this was distinct from another factory with a dye-house, no doubt the one built on Gooseacre.

By 1831, the factory was occupied by Messrs Francis and Everett, who became bankrupt in that year. The stock was put up for auction and the machinery and factory offered by private contract or lease. There were then thirteen cutters, eleven scribbling and carding engines, four gigs, six blue-vats, and two presses. A further sale in 1832 included eight billies and between twenty and thirty jennies, and also a 12 h.p. steam-engine. It was then said that the factory was being converted to other purposes. W.M. Everett died in that year, and his daughter surrendered his leasehold for £1,000. No more is known of the factory, which was pulled down by 1886.

WRO, 101/91 and 101/137;
DG, 16.6.1831, 11.10.1832;
SJ, 26.12.1796.

Heytesbury Mill

K.H. Rogers, in Wiltshire And Somerset Woollen Mills, published by the Pasold Research Fund Ltd., in 1976, noted:

Heytesbury
In 1796 Sir William Pierce Ashe a’Court leased to John Gale Everett, clothier, a watercourse adjoining the road from Heytesbury to Hindon. The lessee was the son of William Everett, long a clothier at Horningsham, and was then aged about nineteen. A factory was probably built at this time. J.G. Everett was succeeded by his uncle and namesake, who also ran the Upton Lovell mill.

In 1816, the business was clearly extensive, employing 233 hands. In 1820, Everett made his will leaving his house, factories, and lands in trust for his ‘natural and adopted son’, Joseph Butt alias Everett; should Joseph choose to carry on the business and do so for twenty years, the property was to  be conveyed to him. If he became bankrupt, his tenancy was to cease, and he was to live within five miles of Heytesbury for 250 days in every year. A lease to start on J.G. Everett’s death was made to reinforce the will in 1821. He died in 1825, and Joseph succeeded in fulfilling the conditions so that the property became his absolutely in 1846. Within a few months, he sold the whole, which included extensive lands, to Lord Heytesbury, for £22,000. This probably marked the end of the trade, as the firm is not mentioned in the 1848 directory. In 1855 the building materials of Everett’s house and factory were offered for sale. The factory stood on the east side of the road running from the Salisbury road down to Heytesbury Mill. The watercourse mentioned in the lease of 1796 can only have supplied slight and intermittent water power, but it was still in use in 1836.

WRO, 101, 172/10, and 828/6;
SJ, 7.9.1807, 8.4.1811;
DG, 5.7.1855.

A Short History Of The Hospital Of St. John, Heytesbury

Tuesday 4th April 1972

A SHORT HISTORY OF THE HOSPITAL
OF ST. JOHN, HEYTESBURY
To celebrate the Fifth Centenary of the Endowment
Of the Hospital by Margaret, Lady Hungerford.
April 4th, 1472 – April 4th, 1972

This short history is dedicated to the memory of
William, Baron Heytesbury, Chairman of Trustees.
April 19th, 1949 – November 26th, 1971

THE HUNGERFORD ALMSHOUSE

Most Heytesbury people know about the Hungerford Almshouse, commonly called St. John’s Hospital. Its full dedication is to St. John the Baptist and St. Katherine. Lady Margaret Hungerford died in 1479 and was buried with her husband in the Chapel of Our Lady in the Cathedral at Salisbury. Her greatest memorial is the Heytesbury Almshouse, founded by her father-in-law, Walter, first Lord Hungerford, because by her self sacrifice and perseverance she succeeding in endowing it. She did this in the name and for the honour of her late father-in-law and her husband Walter and Robert, Lords of Hungerford and Heytesbury.

There are 18 similar hospitals or almshouses in Wiltshire. The Foundation Deed is dated April 4th, 1472, reciting Letters Patent of Edward the Fourth and it instructs certain Trustees to found, create, erect and establish a certain almshouse which shall last forever, consisting always of a chaplain, twelve poor men and one woman, of whom the chaplain shall be warden of the same house constantly at Heightsbury in the County of Wilts; “for doing and performing of divine services and other orations everyday in the parish church of Heightsbury aforesaid, for our well-being and that of our beloved consort, Elizabeth Queen of England, and of the Reverant Father in Christ, Richard Beauchamp, Bishop of Sarum, while we live and for our souls when we have departed this life . . . . “

There follows in this repetitive medieval language all the details about the running and maintenance of the almshouse. The hospital has remained substantially unchanged until this day according to the wishes of the Hungerfords. Its constitution was elaborated in 48 statutes, dated February 20th, 1472. After the death of Lady Margaret, the Custos was to be appointed, as he still is, by the Chancellor of Salisbury Cathedral. He can, however, be removed by the Dean and Chapter of Salisbury if he misbehaves or fails to observe the statutes of the hospital. On admission the Custos had to take an Oath to observe these statutes, and he had also to make an inventory of the goods of the house. His duties included the administration of the hospital, the celebration of divine service both there and in the parish church of Heytesbury, daily, when he is disposed, prayers for various members of the Hungerford family and their retainers, and teach grammar to the poor children of Heytesbury. He was not originally permitted to hold any other benefice, or to be absent from Heytesbury for more than a month at any one time. In selecting the poor men, servants or tenants of the Hungerford family were to be preferred. No married man was to be admitted, and all had to live a common life and not to go away without permission. They had to pray daily for their benefactors and if they did not know the prayers these must be taught them.

If they had any goods when they entered the house, half of these were taken for the use of the house, and if at any time their income should exceed four marks yearly they were to be excluded. The woman had to look after them all, to do the washing and to care for the poor men when they were sick. All were to be given two pairs of hose, two pairs of shoes and two shirts each year. Every second or third year they were also to receive gowns and hoods of white woollen cloth with Jhu and Xrt (Jesus Christ) in black letters on the breast and on the shoulders. There was a weekly allowance for commons varying with the price of wheat, and the woman was also to have 5/- a year to buy a kirtle and 13/4d. for her labours. The hospital had a common chest for its money and records and a common seal, which now stands in the main Entrance Hall of the Hospital. It has four locks, the keys of which were held by the Lord of the Manor, the Custos and two Trustworthy Parishioners of Heytesbury, appointed by the Dean of Salisbury. Another chest in the parish church held its books, but this is now in the County Archives at Trowbridge.

The original endowment consisted of the manors of Cheverell Burnell and Cheverell Hales (Great Cheverell) with 20 cartloads of wood yearly from Southleigh. Later in 1633 the hospital had property in Upton Scudamore, Calne, Stockley and Warminster.

During the Reformation and the Dissolution of the monasteries, the hospital escaped closure, but its annual revenue of £42 was taken by the Crown and given to Sir William Sharington. Cardinal Pole later interested himself in the restoration of the hospital to its proper use and restored its revenue, and this was confirmed by Elizabeth the First. From this time there was a separate school and a schoolmaster who received £10 a year for doing the teaching, raised in 1607 to £15. At this time, too, some modifications of the religious duties of the Custos were made consequent upon the reformation of the Church of England.

On June 12th, 1765, the almshouse was destroyed by fire and was rebuilt in 1766-7. This was the Great Fire of Heytesbury which burnt nearly all the town. The following words were worked upon a sampler made by Alice Snelgrove in 1790 . . .

“Be it remembered that on Wednesday, the 12th day of June, 1765, about 12 o’clock in the forenoon, a dreadful fire began at the West end of the Town of Heytesbury, in the County of Wilts, at a house then in the occupation of Mr. William Wilkins, which burnt with such irresistible violence (the wind then blowing very briskly from the West, and the weather very dry), that notwithstanding the endeavour of the Inhabitants and neighbourhood, with the help of 3 Engines to stop its progress, the hospital and chapel adjoining thereto, together with the free-schools, barns, stables, out-houses, ricks of corn and hay, belonging to the several Farms, Stocks in Trade, and other effects; the whole loss being then computed at 13 thousand pounds. Two persons were miserably burnt, one of them an old woman between 70 and 80 years of age, the other a child of 19 months old, who did a few days afterwards. Many of the Inhabitants being destitute of houses, were forced to take up their lodgings in the church, till houses could be produced for them. – Alice Geo. Snelgrove”s work, Ramsey, April th 21st, 1790.”

Towards the end of the 18th century the cartload f wood which had been drawn from Southleigh for over 300 years was converted into an annual rent of £14. The Rev. David Williams, vicar of Heytesbury, becme Custos as well as Vicar by which time the schoolmaster had long disappeared for lack of boys eager to learn Latin, and the poor men’s uniform had been changed from white to scarlet with a badge of blue letters IHS – Latin for Jes hominum salvator = Jesus the Saviour of Men. It was in these scarlet cloaks and silk hats that the poor men attended the parish church on Sunday mornings and sat together for service. A portrait of one of one them outside the Parish Church is produced on the front cover of this booklet. These cloaks and silk hats were finally abolished about 1958.

Among the interesting characters who were one of the “poor men” was James Farley who died in 1881. He was one of the guards on the island of St. Helena who had to challenge Napoleon with the words: “Who goes there?” To which, he sad, Napoleon always answered: Emperor,” and James would reply: “Pass, Emperor”.

The constitution of the Hospital has been revised from time to time to accommodate itself to changing conditions. It is now governed by 9 Trustees – the Lord of the Manor, the Chancellor of Salisbury Cathedral, the Vicar and the two Churchwardens of Heytesbury, the Custos and three others, who must be resident in Wiltshire, and approved by the Charity Commissioners.

The present building dates from 1766-7 after the Great Fire. It cost about £1,600! It was built round three sides of a rectangle with a coach house at the north corner, and a clock with bell over the main entrance. The architect was Esau Reynolds of Trowbridge.

In 1962 a major development took place, the first in over 500 years; flats for married couples were provided, at a cost of £38,000, and the coach house was converted into a chapel. The altar cross was presented by Mrs. Clare Smith, then of Heytesbury, now of Upton Lovel, and Chairman of the Trustees. The Rt. Revd. Victor Pike, Bishop of Sherborne, dedicated the new work, and Mrs. Roger Scott of Crockerton, a connection of the ancient family of the Hungerfords, through marriage, unveiled a plaque. She was deputising for Beryl, Lady Heytesbury, who was indisposed at the time, and who died in 1968.

Heytesbury Mothers’ Union

From The Country Churchman, Warminster And District edition, October 1968:

Heytesbury And Tytherington With Knook
Mothers’ Union.
No meeting on October 2nd. We are invited to the Zoo evening. Committee members are invited to the Quiet Afternoon on Tuesday, October 8th, from 2.30 to 3.45 p.m. at Westbury Church. It is for the Deanery.
As many as possible will be going to Salisbury City Hall on Wednesday 30th, to a meeting addressed by our Central President. We are sharing a coach with Christ Church branch, and names of those wishing to go should be given to Mrs. Ginever as early as possible.

Visitors To Churches

From The Country Churchman, Warminster And District edition, October 1968:

Heytesbury And Tytherington With Knook

Visitors To The Churches

Though people do not attend church services nowadays as they used to do, they visit the buildings by their millions – not only the cathedrals, abbeys and minsters, but every sort of church from the smallest to the largest, in remote hamlet and in the city centre, from the modern to the Saxon. 

Our three churches have their share of visitors, especially Tytherington. Heytesbury merits far more visitors than it gets, and this is probably because it is on a busy main road and parking is not easy, that it does not get more.

Looking through the Visitors Book in Heytesbury Church, which is not signed by every visitor, one notices that they come from every county in England (in the present book begun in 1960 the only counties not mentioned are Cumberland and Westmoreland) and from Scotland, Wales and Ireland, from hundreds of towns and villages. And from overseas of course – the Channel Islands, France, Belgium, Holland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, the U.S.A., Canada, Malaya, and others.

From time to time interesting personal notes are written by the visitor, for example:

1961
Mrs. Winifred M. Hill of Plymouth, grand-daughter of the late “Grannie” Hunt of this parish, who stayed with her 55 years ago (1906).
Mr. and Mrs. Paul Huggett, of Dunedin, N.Z. neice of Mrs. B. Bartlett.

1962
(Lt..-Col) Roger J.B. Anderson, of Bushey, late of Heytesbury. (Colonel Anderson is the son of a previous Vicar of Heytesbury).

1963
R.C. Hains, choirboy here 40 years ago, 1923, now of Glamorgan.

1964
Thelma Tyrrrell Graeme. Roseville, Sydney, Australia. “A member of the Hungerford family. Captain Emmanuel Hungerford migrated to New South Wales, Australia, with his wife and family in 1821, and Bishop William Tyrrell was consecrated a bishop in Westminster Abbey in 1847, and was appointed to Newcastle, N.S.W. becoming the first bishop and building the beautiful cathedral.”

1965
Rev. and Mrs. E.W.L. Brainwood, Sydney, N.S.W. “Last time visited this church in 1918 as young Australian soldier.

1968
John and Annabel Foulston, of 74 Eton Rise, London, N.W.5. grandson of William Foulston, wheelwright of Heytesbury.

Some refer to the beauty of the church and one wrote “Thank you for your wise bookstall”. 

error: Content is protected !!