Allotment Piece Or Parcel Of Meadow Land In Spurt Mead, Boreham

Extract from The Deed Of Feoffment Of The Chapel Of St. Lawrence At Warminster And Other Property Belonging To The Chapel Feoffees, From Old To New Feoffees, 21st July 1876:

. . . . All That Allotment piece or parcel of Meadow Land situate lying and being in Spurt Mead in the parish of Warminster aforesaid, containing 1r. 10p., and marked R D in the said 5th Plan annexed to the said Award, now in the occupation of Mr. Bradfield as yearly Tenant at a rent of £1, and numbered 267a on the said Survey.

The Ham (Watermeadow) And The Ilonds (Common), Boreham

Extract from The Deed Of Feoffment Of The Chapel Of St. Lawrence At Warminster And Other Property Belonging To The Chapel Feoffees, From Old To New Feoffees, 21st July 1876:

. . . . And Also one rood of Meadow lying in Bourton otherwise Boreham aforesaid commonly called “the Ham,” then or late in the occupation of Francis Gooderich or his assigns, adjoining to the Common called “the Ilonds,” on the East part, to the Watercourse on the South part, to the lands late of John Gifford on the West part, and to a certain River on the North part.

Tenement, Curtilage And Garden In The Tenure Of Alexander Pierce At Boreham

Extract from The Deed Of Feoffment Of The Chapel Of St. Lawrence At Warminster And Other Property Belonging To The Chapel Feoffees, From Old To New Feoffees, 21st July 1876:

. . . . And Also one Tenement lying and being in Bourton otherwise Boreham within the parish of Warminster aforesaid with a Curtilage and Garden to the same tenement adjoining containing by estimation one rood, then or late in the tenure of Alexander Pierce or his assigns, adjoining to the Highway on the East part, to the land late of the Lord Audley on the South part and on the West part, and the lands of the Heirs of Alexander Staples on the North part.

Drunk Or Merely Excited?

In June 1875, Charles Dredge, the landlord of the Old Bell Inn, Warminster, was charged with being drunk while in charge of a horse and trap, returning from Heytesbury Fair.

The magistrates bench, presided over by Lord Heytesbury, couldn’t make up their minds as to whether Mr. Dredge had been drunk or merely excited. They decided to give him the benefit of the doubt and dismissed the case.

Fire At Pound Street, Warminster

From The Warminster Herald, Saturday 13th December 1873:

FIRE – Between 6 and 7 o’clock last evening a fire broke out in two old cottages in Pound Street, belonging to Mr. Henry Trollope. The fire bell was rung, and in a very short time the fire engine, with plenty of assistants, was at the spot. The fire had taken too great a hold of the buildings to allow of their being saved, and efforts were accordingly directed to prevent the fire from spreading to other and adjoining property. The two cottages destroyed were, we understand, insured, though only for a small amount. It is said that the cottage in which the fire originated was unoccupied, but that some men had been working there during the day.

Henry Ball Absent From His Service As An Apprentice

From The Warminster Herald, Saturday 29th November 1873:

Henry Ball was charged by Mr. Benjamin Parsons with absenting himself from his service as an apprentice at Warminster, on the 24th November. Mr. Parsons stated that defendant was at work at Boreham, on the day in question, and never returned to work after dinner, but had spent the afternoon at the “Yew Tree.” He also referred to the previous conduct of the defendant. On the 1st October, 1872, he was before the bench, when defendant expressed his sorrow and promised not to offend again. Fined £1 and costs or 14 days’ hard labour.

Destruction By Fire Of Bishopstrow Mill, Sunday 23rd November 1873

From The Warminster Herald And General Weekly Advertiser For Wilts., Somerset and Dorset, Saturday 29th November 1873:

DESTRUCTION BY FIRE OF BISHOPSTROW MILLS

On Sunday afternoon last the corn mill known as Bishopstrow Mill was entirely destroyed by fire. The mill was in the occupation of Mr. William Hayter, an old and much-respected inhabitant of the parish, whose dwelling-house adjoined the mill, and indeed was partly under the same roof.

The fire was discovered between two and three o’clock in the afternoon, and no time was lost in dispatching a messenger to Warminster, to apprise the police of the fire, and to obtain the assistance of a fire engine. With most commendable promptitude, Mr. Superintendent Abbott and Inspector Pierce, with several constables of the force reached the scene of the conflagration. The large fire-engine under the control of Mr. Robert White, was got out and conveyed to the mill, a distance of nearly two miles, with wonderful alacrity. Indeed, the application of the engine had not been made five minutes before it was, with all necessary appliances, on its way to the fire. The mill was of ancient structure, and internally was largely composed of wood, which was very dry, and burnt most readily.

When the engine arrived, the fire had got such a hold that it seemed impossible it could be extinguished. The engine, however, was in capital working order, and there being plenty of water, the large discharge pipe was used. The result was surprising; an immense quantity of water was discharged on the fire, and ultimately it was got under, though not till the mill, with its machinery, was entirely destroyed. Strenuous efforts was made to save the dwelling-house and buildings adjoining the mill, and the furniture and effects. The furniture was all removed, but it was rendered virually valueless, having to be tumbled out of the windows and down stairs in a most hasty manner. Indeed, it might as well have been allowed to burn. The dwelling-house and other buildings were also virtually destroyed. The boilers, brick-work and all, were pulled down, and some of the fire-places were pulled out, and also were some iron window frames.

There were many willing hands, but of course discretion at such a time was not to be looked for. As soon as Mr. Abbott reached the spot, he and his officers gave such directions as prevented wanton destruction. Too much praise cannot be given to Mr. Abbott, Inspector Pierce, and other constables. Mr. White, who had charge of the engine, is also deserving of the highest commendation. No one could have acted with better discretion, or have worked more laboriously than he did. We should be remiss in our duty if we did not specially mention, as among the many inhabitants of the parish and district who lent ready aid, Mr. Frederick Heath. He really worked with desperation, and acted most courageously.

Great sympathy was expressed for Mr. Hayter and his family, and the houses of several kind neighbours were most readily placed at their disposal. By almost 4.30 the fire was thoroughly got under, but the fire engine was kept there all night. Mr. White and staff and police constables remained in charge. On the following day, under the direction of Mr. Superintendent Abbott, all the partly consumed wood was removed, and the tottering walls were knocked down.

The mill belonged to William Temple, Esq., of Bishopstrow House. It was insured in the Sun office, but only for a sum of £200, which does not represent more than a fourth of its value. Much anxiety was felt on behalf of Mr. Hayter, it being feared that neither the stock in his mill nor his furniture was insured, and as what was not destroyed was rendered almost valueless, the loss to him would have been very serious. We are most happy, however, to be able to announce that Mr. Hayter was insured, both for stock and furniture, for a small amount, sufficient, we hope, to cover his actual loss. Of course he will be a great loser by the fire, as his trade will be brought to a standstill. We trust, however, that neighbouring millers will render him all the assistance in their power.

The origin of the fire is a mystery. The miller stated that when he closed the mill on the Saturday night, he carefully extinguished his candle, and left all quite right. He was quite certain that nothing was then burning. A boy, the son of the miller, went into the mill about 8 o’clock on Sunday morning, to get some food for the fowls. He declared that he did not notice or smell anything burning. Now it seems scarcely conceiveable that the fire could have originated on the Saturday night, and that the boy could have gone into the mill later on Sunday morning and not seen smoke from it. Indeed, the place would by that time have been full of smoke. It is much more probable that the boy, when he went in for the corn to feed the fowls, lighted the candle left by his father and inspected some rat traps he had set about the mill, and, while doing so, dropped a spark from the candle, which led to the conflagration. Be this as it may, there can be not the slightest reason to suppose that the fire was other than the result of a pure accident, and for which no one is to blame.

Had the fire broken out in the night there might have been a loss of life, as there would have been a number of young children sleeping in the house, and the bedroom of Mr. Hayter, who is got very feeble, being situated actually under a portion of the mill. As we before stated, Mr. Hayter and the members of his family met with every attention and much sympathy from Bishopstrow House, and from the neighbours generally.

Elsewhere in the same issue of The Warminster Herald was the following notice:

Mr. HAYTER begs to return his most grateful thanks to the neighbours of Boreham [sic] and Warminster who so very kindly assisted in endeavouring to extinguishing the unfortunate fire which terminated in the total destruction of Boreham [sic] Mill.

[The newspaper staff obviously made a mistake with their printing blocks, transposing Boreham for Bishopstrow. The fire was at Bishopstrow Mill and Bishopstrow neighbours assisted.]

An advertisement in The Warminster Herald And General Weekly Advertiser For Wilts., Somerset And Dorset, issue dated Saturday 13th December 1873, showed at least one other miller was available after the loss of Bishopstrow Mill:

NORTON BAVANT MILL.
HENRY J. BAILEY
BEGS respectfully to inform agriculturalists and the general public that he is prepared to do Gristing work at his mill, such as was done by Mr. W. HAYTER, at the Bishopstrow Mill, before the late destructive fire there. He hopes to be able to meet the convenience of the entire neighbourhood by promptly executing all orders entrusted to him.

A notice in The Warminster Herald, issue dated Saturday 20th December 1873, reveals strong support for the rebuilding of a mill at Bishopstrow, from William Hayter’s neighbours:

THE LATE FIRE AT BISHOPSTROW MILL. – We have great pleasure in giving publicity to the following address, and to Mr. Temple’s acknowledgement of the same. We are sure the public will feel deeply grateful to Mr. Temple for his kindly consideration of their wishes:-

     TO WILLIAM TEMPLE, Esq., – We the undersigned, having seen with the greatest regret the complete destruction of Bishopstrow Mill be fire, hereby beg to express our great interest in seeing efforts made by you, as the proprietor, towards rebuilding the same; and in order to strengthen you in the idea, we beg to record the fact that the mill is one which could be least spared in the neighbourhood, as it possesses so many advantages over others which we may well capitulate. In the first place it possesses a most extensive reservoir and a better fall of water than any other on the same stream, consequently can be worked when others remain idle, which, through dry summers, is a most essential boon to other millers as well as to the farmers and tradesmen in the neighbourhood; and we very much fear if it is allowed to remain unbuilt will entail a very considerable inconvenience upon the customers in Gristing; who have so extensively patronised it from almost time immemorial. Under these circumstances, together with many others which might be adduced, we beg respectfully to ask you to rebuild the mill, feeling sure that it will not only prove a remunerative investment for yourself, but at the same time confer a great benefit and privilege upon your tenants and neighbours.
We are, dear Sir,
Your obedient servants.
[Here follows forty-one signatures.] *

Mr. TEMPLE, having received the above address which has been signed by so many of his friends and neighbours, begs to acknowledge in this public manner the receipt of it, and to thank them for their kind interest in his welfare, and to assure them the matter shall have his best and earliest consideration.

* The Warminster Herald did not print the names of the signees.

Reward For Information About Who Damaged A Steam-Engine

From The Warminster Herald, Saturday 28th August 1873:

£5 REWARD. WHEREAS, some evil-disposed Person or Persons did, on Monday, the 18th instant, unlawfully and maliciously do Damage to and Injure a Steam-Engine, the property of Mr. W.S. Pullen, in a field of his on the Parsonage Farm, Warminster. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that any person who shall give such information as will lead to the Conviction of the Offender or Offenders, shall receive the above award. J.G. GOODMAN, Solicitor to the Warminster Prosecution Society For The Protection of Property and Prevention of Theft, August 1873.

Fined For Being Drunk At Eastleigh

From The Warminster Herald, Saturday 9th August 1873:

PETTY SESSIONS, Thursday. – Before the Hon. W.L/Holmes a’Court and Rev. G.F.S. Powell. Alfred Macey, of Sutton, labourer, who did not appear, was summoned for having been unlawfully drunk at Eastleigh. The conduct of the accused had been of the most aggravating nature. The facts of the case were deposed to by John Macey, game-keeper to John Torrence, Esq. The Bench, their being previous convictions, fined the accused 10s. and 7s. 6d. costs, or 14 days imprisonment in default.

error: Content is protected !!