Warminster Town Council Gives 10 Objections To 77 Homes On Land Next To Ashley Coombe

Wednesday 18th February 2026

Press release from Warminster Town Council:

Town councillors have unanimously objected to a planning application for homes on land off Ashley Coombe in line with strong arguments from local residents at the Planning Advisory Committee on Monday 16th February.

The planning team heard from passionate residents who opposed outline planning application for the erection of up to 77 homes, public open space, landscaping and sustainable urban drainage system, with vehicular access off Ashley Coombe.

Cllr Phil Keeble explained: “The committee unanimously objected to the Ashley Combe application on numerous points planning reasons. The site was rejected by the Neighbourhood Plan process. It is exactly the sort of development we are seeking to avoid.

“We can’t stop developers putting forward sites hoping they will get planning permission, but if we allocate a site for 90 houses in the Neighbourhood Plan, we can get 5 years protection from such applications where the balance is tilted back in favour of the community. The Planning Advisory Committee takes its role seriously.

“I hope the developer listens to the committee and the public and withdraws its planning application.”

𝐌𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐬:

1. 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐝 𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜 – The proposal concentrates all housing within a single zone served by a single access point. This design will funnel traffic into one location, significantly increasing vehicle movements and congestion in an already constrained area.

The access roads are narrow, winding, and include blind bends. The proposed junction with Deverill Road is located on the crest of a hill, creating poor visibility and a heightened risk of collisions.

The development will inevitably increase traffic onto the A36, a road that has experienced multiple serious collisions near Warminster in recent years.

The site is located at a significant distance from town amenities. There is no clear provision for safe cycle routes, and public transport availability is questionable, resulting in extra reliance on private vehicles.

2. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬 – the proposal puts housing within the buffer zone around the sewage work. The odour is likely to be a nuisance and the presence of swarms of flies will have a public health impact.

The log of sniff tests are woefully inadequate and contain no tests during the 5 hottest months of the year. The environment agency has received 182 complaints in the past 3 years.

Odour and safety impacts linked to the Malaby Gas Biodigester have not been assessed.

3. 𝐍𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐍𝐞𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 – The site is close to the River Wylye, an SSSI and SAC. Run-off and pollution risks threaten this European-protected chalk stream. Run-off from roads and roofs of any new development on this site will enter the stream currently in Flood Zone 2.

Wessex Water is aware that Warminster already has ongoing issues. The site also overlies an important aquifer, posing contamination risks from clearance work, building and drainage from future dwellings. Buying offsite credits does not address the harm that would be done locally.

4. 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 – The site supports protected species such as newts, kites, hedgehogs, deer, swifts, toads, woodpeckers and pollinators. A badger sett also exists on the proposed site. At least four species of bat have been recorded in the designated area. There are no reliable plans for biodiversity net gains. The development would negatively impact on the dark skies area

5. 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐞𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 – Wiltshire Council Archaeology Service have acknowledged that archaeological findings have been identified on the site. Impacts have not been adequately assessed. Test trenches should be dug before any layout is considered and any planning application is put forward and make any outline planning application fraught with risk of harm.

6. 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 – Two and three-storey dwellings will overlook existing bungalows. The design is essentially suburban

7. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐲; it has been excluded from the Draft Warminster Neighbourhood Plan that is currently undergoing Regulation 14 consultation.

8. 𝐋𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞 – There is no provision for public art and the proposed public open space is of low quality and poor layout.

9. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐡𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 is such that there is a risk of flooding, particularly from surface water.

10. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦, with all matters except access reserved, we are concerned that the Planning Authority is being asked to accept the principle of development without sufficient certainty over how these impacts would be addressed in practice. While outline permission may be suitable for simple and uncontroversial sites, the opposite should apply in what is a complex site which has already been rejected for inclusion in the merging Neighbourhood Plan.

The objection will now be submitted to the planning authority at Wiltshire Council.

The comments from Warminster Town Council are only advisory, any decision on whether to grant planning permission and any associated conditions will be made by Wiltshire Council.

For more information contact Warminster Town Council, Tel: 01985 214847 or email: admin@warminster-tc.gov.uk

Press Release From EBBRAG

Wednesday 7th January 2026

Press Release from EBBRAG (the East Boreham Businesses And Residents Action Group):

Previous press coverage from EBBRAG (the East Boreham Businesses And Residents Action Group) about the consequences of residential development on Home Farm, has awakened the community.

As yet, however, most people are unaware that with the proposed Ashley Coombe (77 houses), Cley Hill View (227 houses) and Home Farm (135 houses) developments this makes a total of a further 439 houses on top of the WWUE (1200 houses?) without any change or increase to the supporting infrastructure. This make 1639 houses in Warminster when all are completed.

We understand houses are not selling as expected on Jubilee Gardens and the developer has slowed the build.

The Town Council were delighted when the application on Westbury Road was turned down in March 2025. They, and Wiltshire Council, have singularly failed, however, to plan, compensate or provide increased infrastructure support for this new increase in housing.

As an example of the storm that is coming when all 1639 houses are completed, based on Government National Averages in 2022:

Education: a further 409 Primary School Children and 213 Secondary Children. Schools are near capacity now.

Traffic: 1639 houses brings an increase of 738 cars (one car/van per household) and 171 cars (for 2 cars/van per household) in Warminster, making a total of 909 cars/vans when the houses are complete. The  town is grid locked at peak times in the morning and afternoon already.

Finally, developers are failing to meet the conditions imposed on applications when granted i.e. where is the new school and surgery for Jubilee Gardens? Where is the environmental planting for Boreham Mead and Mill Island? 

Development Of Farm Land In Warminster Sparks Concern

Friday 2nd January 2026

From the Facebook page of EBBRAG (the East Boreham Business And Residents Action Group) ~

From The Wiltshire Times (Senior Correspondent John Baker) Friday 2nd January 2026:

Development Of Farm Land In Warminster Sparks Concern

Residents in Warminster have voiced growing concerns as developers press ahead with proposals for two farmland sites just as the town’s Neighbourhood Plan Review reaches its final consultation stage.

The Warminster Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) Review, a community-led framework designed to protect local heritage, safeguard green spaces and guide future development, is now nearing completion following three years of preparation.

An eight-week public consultation on the full draft plan is due to begin at the end of January 2026. Following this, the plan will be submitted to Wiltshire Council for independent examination in the summer, before being put to a local referendum. A majority vote in favour would be required for the plan to be formally adopted.

However, many residents have voiced concerns that the process may not progress quickly enough to prevent farmland being used for housing development sites.

Developers including Bellway Homes and Rubix Land are already advancing proposals on sites previously considered by the town council during earlier stages of the plan’s development.

At Home Farm on Boreham Road, Bellway Homes is proposing up to 135 new houses. Meanwhile, at Ashley Coombe, Rubix Land is continuing to pursue a development scheme despite the town council withdrawing its support after updated surveys raised concerns about land levels, underground services and potential odour issues.

More than 320 residents have voiced their opposition to the developments ahead of the Neighbourhood Plan Review public consultation being launched.

Around 100 residents attended a public meeting over the summer to discuss the Ashley Coombe proposals, while the East Boreham Business and Residents Action Group (EBBRAG) has launched a campaign to strongly oppose development at Home Farm, holding meetings and mobilising support online.

EBBRAG members Gwyn and Anne Evans said: “Development of this land was unequivocally turned down by a Government inspector in 2020. Despite this, our local town council has included this complex site as a singular option for development, for residents of Warminster to vote on at referendum, even though 61 per cent voted against this in its informal survey.

“To add more fuel to the fire of opposition, Bellway Homes, with the full knowledge of the town council, are poised to submit a ‘speculative’ planning application. Local residents are outraged at how a supposedly democratic and ‘community led’ process can be willingly compromised in this manner.

“We feel decisions, well intentioned though they may have been, have largely been made behind closed doors and without meaningful reference to the community of Warminster.”

Bellway Homes says its Home Farm scheme is needed to help meet local housing demand. The developer has stated that 40 per cent of the homes would be affordable, with provision for multi-generational living, and that more than half of the 5.9-hectare site would be retained as public green space.

Residents raised questions about the plans at a public consultation on November 19, with formal feedback accepted until December 5. The group is urging locals to formally object to the housing proposal.

At Ashley Coombe, Rubix Land is promoting a revised proposal for 77 homes, now accessed solely via Ashley Coombe after removing a previously included parcel of land near Fanshaw Way. The developer says it remains committed to the site, despite the withdrawal of the WNP Review Steering Group support.

In a statement, Rubix said: “Whilst the WNPR Steering Group has withdrawn support for this revised scheme, Rubix considers it offers a suitable and acceptable alternative.” The company is seeking further feedback from the community on design, green space and connectivity.

Meanwhile, Warminster town councillor Phil Keeble has urged residents to take part in the upcoming consultation on the Neighbourhood Plan, saying: “The draft plan has been prepared by local representatives with the input of hundreds of residents. Your feedback is vital to inform the final plan we submit for formal examination and adoption.”

Further information about the Neighbourhood Plan consultation is available from Warminster Town Council on 01985 214847, by emailing [admin@warminster-tc.gov.uk](mailto:admin@warminster-tc.gov.uk), or via [www.warminsterplan.com](http://www.warminsterplan.com/).

Picture shows an artist’s impression of how the new houses on the farmland will look. Image from Wiltshire Council.

http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/…/25731692…/

For further information about the Home Farm development please contact EBBRAG (the East Boreham Business And Residents Action Group:

email: info@ebbrag.com

website: www.ebbrag.com